Rich Morin wrote:
> At 2:40 PM -0500 3/1/02, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >Rich Morin wrote:
> >> At 7:23 PM -0500 2/26/02, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> >Well, the internals.ps paper was removed for a reason, so I'd advise
> >> >you not to print it.
> >> And that reason would be??? Seriously, it seems like a useful paper;
> >> even if it isn't needed in the distribution, it may be worth printing.
> Peter E>It doesn't correspond to reality any longer.
> Bruce M>I just bloated the tarball and wasn't really for general consuption.
> It sounds like the paper should probably be left out of the next set of
> PostgreSQL volumes. Perhaps it could go into a volume of "historic" papers.
There used to be a whole lot of papers at Berkeley web site.
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2002-03-02 17:20:10|
|Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 7.2 docs |
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2002-03-02 12:30:28|
|Subject: Re: web page issues|