Rich Morin wrote:
> At 7:23 PM -0500 2/26/02, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >Well, the internals.ps paper was removed for a reason, so I'd advise
> >you not to print it.
> And that reason would be??? Seriously, it seems like a useful paper;
> even if it isn't needed in the distribution, it may be worth printing.
I just bloated the tarball and wasn't really for general consuption.
> P.S. There is no entry for pgsql-docs on the "User's Lounge" web page,
> so I can't subscribe. Also, there is a formatting error in the
> HTML for the "pgsql-sql" entry on the page:
Docs mailing list is in the developer's lounge.
> [archives pgsql-sql - This is a discussion area ...
I don't see the problem. Looks fine here.
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: andreas moroder||Date: 2002-03-01 20:20:40|
|Subject: Error in documentation|
|Previous:||From: Vince Vielhaber||Date: 2002-03-01 15:50:06|
|Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 7.2 docs|