Re: elog() patch

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: elog() patch
Date: 2002-02-28 23:07:20
Message-ID: 200202282307.g1SN7KX28114@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > Postmaster -d flag effects only postmaster message, not backend messages
>
> Why?

OK, how about this? What if we add a new GUC parameter,
postmaster_min_messages, and that controls the postmaster printing to
the server logs. (Postmaster has no client to print to.) Then, we can
propogate the -d flag to the backends, and if someone wants just
postmaster loggging, they can use the GUC parameter.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-02-28 23:27:26 Re: Database Caching
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2002-02-28 22:23:46 Database Caching