| From: | Jean-Paul ARGUDO <jean-paul(dot)argudo(at)idealx(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)krosing(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Jean-Paul ARGUDO <jean-paul(dot)argudo(at)idealx(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, sdinot(at)idealx(dot)com, dbarth(at)idealx(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Yet again on indices... |
| Date: | 2002-02-27 14:59:00 |
| Message-ID: | 20020227155900.A27233@singer.ird.idealx.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > postgresql.conf : enable_seqscan = false
> You could just do
> set enable_seqscan to 'off'
> in sql
thanks for the tip :-)
> > => Uh? seq scan'cost is lower than index scan?? => mailto hackers
> It often is. Really.
> > What's your opinion?
> What are the real performance numbers ?
Finally, testing and testing again shows the choice of table scan is faster than
index scan on this 26K tuples table. really impresive.
I posted another mail about Oracle vs PG results in a comparative survey I'm
currently working on for 1 month. Please read it, I feel a bit disapointed with
Oracle's 1200 tps..
Thanks for your support Hannu!
--
Jean-Paul ARGUDO
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2002-02-27 15:03:37 | Re: Yet again on indices... |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-02-27 14:54:17 | Re: COPY incorrectly uses null instead of an empty string in last field |