From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kumar Khare <skamit2000(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | Neil Padgett <npadgett(at)redhat(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, param_inder(at)yahoo(dot)com, kharebm(at)yahoo(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: Implementation Proposal For Add Free Behind Capability |
Date: | 2002-02-26 17:45:52 |
Message-ID: | 200202261745.g1QHjqN09341@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Amit Kumar Khare wrote:
> --- Neil Padgett <npadgett(at)redhat(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2002-02-23 at 08:30, Amit Kumar Khare wrote:
> >
> > > Considering thesesuggestions as our baseline we
> > have decided to
> > implement Most Recently Used(MRU) cache replacement
> > policy. Our task
> > will be to identify a large sequentialscan and then
> > advice the buffer
> > manager to apply MRU for cache replacement.
>
> Neil wrote:
> > This could lead to poor buffer performance in the
> > case of multiple
> > backends simultaneously executing queries. How will
> > you handle this?
>
> Certainly it's cause of concern. I am looking for
> literature regarding it. I kindly request you all to
> inform me if any body finds some thing related to it.
My guess is that we should test MRU for large sequenatial scan vs. LRU-K
and see how the compare in various tests.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-02-26 17:56:50 | Re: quotes in SET grammar |
Previous Message | Helge Bahmann | 2002-02-26 17:31:49 | Re: WAL Performance Improvements |