Re: Database->ServerEncoding, ClientEncoding

From: Jean-Michel POURE <jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr>
To: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Database->ServerEncoding, ClientEncoding
Date: 2002-02-26 09:43:30
Message-ID: 200202260943.g1Q9hULx009203@www1.translationforge
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

> ServerEncodingID (Long)
> ServerEncodingName (String)
I still wonder why ServerEncodingID is needed. It adds complexity to pgSchema
without beeing used. Can't ServerEncodingID be masked?

> ClientEncodingID (Long)
> The ClientEncodingID would be the Windows LCID (I assume that's relevant
> in this case)
To you plan to use ClientEncodingID to select fonts? What is LCID for? My
knowledge is very little in this field.

Cheers,
Jean-Michel

In response to

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2002-02-26 10:19:20 Re: fake vs real CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW
Previous Message Jean-Michel POURE 2002-02-26 09:39:47 Re: Database->ServerEncoding, ClientEncoding