Re: elog() proposal

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Karl DeBisschop <kdebisschop(at)range(dot)infoplease(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: elog() proposal
Date: 2002-02-24 12:46:12
Message-ID: 200202241246.g1OCkCQ11689@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Karl DeBisschop wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-02-23 at 12:04, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> writes:
> > > I'm with Peter on this one; let's find another more neutral name.
> >
> > Proposals then? What's been used or bandied about so far are
> > "REALLYFATAL" (yuck, even though I take the blame for it).
> > "STOP" (Vadim put this in, but I object to it as being too vague;
> > it's not at all obvious that it's worse than FATAL).
> > "FATALALL" (also yuck).
> >
> > Surely we can find something that's short, memorable, and clearly
> > a notch more fatal than FATAL.
>
> PANIC ?

MASTERFATAL?
MASTERFAIL?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-02-24 12:51:11 Re: Duration of beta period
Previous Message Karl DeBisschop 2002-02-24 12:42:12 Re: elog() proposal