Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Automatic transactions in psql

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>,Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Automatic transactions in psql
Date: 2002-02-22 16:12:56
Message-ID: 200202221612.g1MGCv112712@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > This is an interesting idea, although you may want to give the user the
> > option to customize his prompt.
> 
> Seems cool.  I am a bit worried about whether the transaction-block
> detection mechanism is reliable, though.  We might need to add something
> to the FE/BE protocol to make this work correctly.

OK, status on this?  Seems we can't apply the patch as-is because of
reliability of the status display.  Do people wnat a TODO item?  I don't
think I want to make an incompatible protocol change for this feature.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-02-22 16:14:24
Subject: Re: point in time recovery and moving datafiles online
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-02-22 16:09:48
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Automatic transactions in psql

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-02-22 16:17:25
Subject: Re: Automatic transactions in psql
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-02-22 16:09:48
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Automatic transactions in psql

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group