Re: Feature requests after crash

From: Jean-Michel POURE <jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Feature requests after crash
Date: 2002-02-22 14:00:08
Message-ID: 200202221400.g1ME08FP011535@www1.translationforge
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

> my_sum(int4, int4)
> "My_Sum"(int4, int4)
> My_Sum(int4, int4)

Yes, but such a redundancy would be detected, which is ***better*** than
nothing. We can then issue a warning instead of "blocking everything".

Furthermore, many names are not case sensitive because of SQL (tables,
views), which makes ILIKE the perfect solution to track dependencies :
tables<->views, views<->functions, tables<->functions, etc...

+ we are only looking for one-level depencies.

This is quite easy to implement using pgSchema... I am
testing ALTER TRIGGER wich will be available tonight.

Cheers,
Jean-Michel

In response to

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jean-Michel POURE 2002-02-22 15:34:58 Update trigger name
Previous Message Dave Page 2002-02-22 13:31:56 Re: Feature requests after crash