Re: Feature requests after crash

From: Jean-Michel POURE <jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Feature requests after crash
Date: 2002-02-22 11:50:03
Message-ID: 200202221150.g1MBo3FP010844@www1.translationforge
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

Le Jeudi 21 Février 2002 23:39, Dave Page a écrit :
> Without these parsers, we will not be able to track dependencies within
> functions or views.

Why do we need parsers?

pgAdmin I had very simple queries to track dependencies (ILIKE
'%function_foo%' clause).

This suffice to build a provides clause is each object. For example, if
"function_foo" is used in "view_bar" and "function_bar":

function_foo->provides="function:function_bar;view:view_bar"
view_bar->requires="function:function_foo";
function_bar->requires="function:function_foo";

If you prefer, provides = child, requires = father.

I agree this is not as powerfull as a recursive dependency table, but this
suffice to offer 99% security to users. The purpose is not to track n-levels
of dependecies but just visualize 1 level for security reasons.

So why not implement it in pgSchema?

Cheers,
Jean-Michel

In response to

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2002-02-22 13:31:56 Re: Feature requests after crash
Previous Message Jean-Michel POURE 2002-02-22 11:37:56 Re: Feature requests after crash