Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Timestamp reverse engeneering bug

From: Jean-Michel POURE <jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>,pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Timestamp reverse engeneering bug
Date: 2002-02-21 20:08:01
Message-ID: 200202212008.g1LK81FP004911@www1.translationforge (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
L I'm using my phone right now so I can't check, but I'm pretty sure that's
> not a bug. Isn't timestamptz a timestamp with timezone e.g. 2002-02-21
> 19:00:00+00?
You are right.

In response to

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Jean-Michel POUREDate: 2002-02-21 21:24:55
Subject: Feature requests after crash
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2002-02-21 19:04:54
Subject: Re: Timestamp reverse engeneering bug

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group