| From: | jtv <jtv(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Joyner <d4ljoyn(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: libpq++ |
| Date: | 2002-01-21 12:04:25 |
| Message-ID: | 20020121130425.B15575@xs4all.nl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 07:16:41PM -0500, David Joyner wrote:
> I agree with you. I guess the person that wrote it is not here to defend
> themselves, so I'll just work around.
Alternatively, you may want to look at libpqxx. Written as a replacement
for libpq++, it has a more modern interface and--knock on wood--addresses
each of the issues discussed here. You lose the "convenience" (and the
inflexibility) of having transactions, connections, and query results all
reside in a single object, and gain the convenience of using exception
handling instead of manual result checking.
You can find it at
http://members.ams.chello.nl/j.vermeulen31/proj-libpqxx.html
I hope someday this could be included in the main PostgreSQL source tree.
Jeroen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | jtv | 2002-01-21 12:18:13 | Re: C++: PgDatabase or PgConnection and lifetime of the objects? |
| Previous Message | Palle Girgensohn | 2002-01-21 00:51:11 | Re: Which perl5 Pg to use? Who maintains it? |