Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade
Date: 2002-01-10 23:40:28
Message-ID: 200201102340.g0ANeSd11323@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Do we want to remove the 7.1beta WAL format code from
> > /contrib/pg_resetxlog?
> 
> Sure, I don't think there's any strong need for it anymore.  Anyone who
> did need that version could get it out of the 7.1 release, anyway.

The following patch removes the V0 WAL handling that was there only for
7.1beta.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-01-11 02:16:25
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-01-10 21:23:44
Subject: Sequence rows need to have FrozenTransactionId

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2002-01-11 00:00:35
Subject: Re: doc/src/FAQ/FAQ.html changes
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-01-10 23:36:10
Subject: Re: doc/src/FAQ/FAQ.html changes

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group