Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org
Cc: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, Kaare Rasmussen <kar(at)kakidata(dot)dk>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item
Date: 2002-01-08 04:01:51
Message-ID: 200201080401.g0841pm12730@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > > > * Make it easier to create a database owned by someone who can't createdb,
> > > >   perhaps CREATE DATABASE dbname WITH USER = "user"
> > > CREATE DATABASE dbname WITH OWNER = "user"
> > A much better idea. There is no conflict in using OWNER here.
> 
> Does this have the multiple "WITH xxx" clauses which were discussed
> earlier? That is a nonstarter for syntax. There are other places in the
> grammar having "with clauses" and multiple arguments or subclauses, and
> having the shift/reduce issues resolved...

Not sure.  Patch is at:

	http://candle.pha.pa.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches2

Are you asking if it has "WITH ARG val, ARG val" or "WITH ARG val WITH
ARG val?"

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Thomas LockhartDate: 2002-01-08 04:03:42
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item
Previous:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2002-01-08 03:58:11
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Thomas LockhartDate: 2002-01-08 04:03:42
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item
Previous:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2002-01-08 03:58:11
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group