Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: RC1 time?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RC1 time?
Date: 2002-01-04 06:52:45
Message-ID: 200201040652.g046qj703782@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >> Aside from the lwlock business, Karel seems to be seeing some problem
> >> in to_timestamp/to_date.
> 
> > I thought Karel sent in a to_date patch yesterday that you applied.  Was
> > there another issue?
> 
> Yes.  He reported something that looked a lot like a DST boundary
> problem, except it wasn't on a DST boundary date.  Thomas thought it
> might be a consequence of the timestamp-vs-timestamptz change from
> 7.1 to 7.2.  See http://fts.postgresql.org/db/mw/msg.html?mid=1345390

Oh, I didn't realize that was a valid issue that needed attention.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-01-04 07:13:01
Subject: Re: freebsd/alpha probs
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-01-04 06:50:38
Subject: Re: RC1 time?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group