Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Is there any performance penalty using --with-ssl?

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Palle Girgensohn <girgen(at)partitur(dot)se>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is there any performance penalty using --with-ssl?
Date: 2002-01-04 05:50:08
Message-ID: 20020104004947.D42799-100000@earth.hub.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Tom Lane wrote:

> Palle Girgensohn <girgen(at)partitur(dot)se> writes:
> > I am preparing the update of the FreeBSD port of PostgreSQL with the
> > upcoming 7.2, and I'm just wondering: is there any performance penalty
> > intoduced by including --with-ssl in the default configure args?
>
> Failure to build/run if SSL libraries are not available?
>
> AFAIK there is no run-time penalty, especially not if the server is
> started without the enable-ssl switch.  But there had better be an
> SSL library to link with.

SSL libraries are default with a FreeBSD install, as its required by SSH
...



In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-01-04 05:50:12
Subject: Re: postgresql.conf syntax
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-01-04 05:45:03
Subject: Re: PGSQL - FAQ 4.1

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group