Mikheev, Vadim wrote:
> > > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > > > Seems nested transactions are not required if we load
> > > > each COPY line in its own transaction, like we do with
> > > > INSERT from pg_dump.
> > >
> > > I don't think that's an acceptable answer. Consider
> > Oh, very good point. "Requires nested transactions" added to TODO.
> Also add performance issue with per-line-commit...
> Also-II - there is more common name for required feature - savepoints.
OK, updated TODO to prefer savepoints term.
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2002-01-03 21:33:02|
|Subject: postgresql.conf syntax|
|Previous:||From: Mikheev, Vadim||Date: 2002-01-03 21:11:34|
|Subject: Re: Bulkloading using COPY - ignore duplicates?|