Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pg_regress.sh startup failure patch

From: Jason Tishler <jason(at)tishler(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Pgsql-Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_regress.sh startup failure patch
Date: 2002-01-03 19:28:42
Message-ID: 20020103192842.GA1380@dothill.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Tom,

On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 11:47:06AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Code up a patch, test it, send in a diff ...

Is the attached patch acceptable?

> I think the only real risk
> here is to be careful not to write anything unportable.  I believe that
> "until" loops exist even in very old Bourne shells, does anyone think
> differently?

I just checked one of my old favorites, "The UNIX Programming
Environment," by Kernighan and Pike, 1984.  It appears that "until"
is understood by the Bourne shell back then, so its use should be OK.

Thanks,
Jason

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Ross ThomasDate: 2002-01-03 20:38:37
Subject: Re: Patch for ODBC driver (look for odbc.ini in more than
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-01-03 18:21:23
Subject: Re: Updated TODO item

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group