Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pg_regress.sh startup failure patch

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jason Tishler <jason(at)tishler(dot)net>, Pgsql-Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_regress.sh startup failure patch
Date: 2002-01-03 17:24:47
Message-ID: 200201031724.g03HOlj16374@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
> > Agreed on both accounts -- I detest open loop solutions myself.
> > I was going to suggest the retry strategy, but I wasn't sure that such a
> > patch would be accepted at this time.  How should I proceed?
> 
> Code up a patch, test it, send in a diff ... I think the only real risk
> here is to be careful not to write anything unportable.  I believe that
> "until" loops exist even in very old Bourne shells, does anyone think
> differently?

Probably true, but I have never seen 'until' used in a script.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-01-03 17:27:58
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-01-03 17:21:11
Subject: Re: Updated TODO item

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group