Re: JDBC 3.0 / JDK 1.4 build issues

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>
Cc: Rene Pijlman <rene(at)lab(dot)applinet(dot)nl>, Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: JDBC 3.0 / JDK 1.4 build issues
Date: 2002-01-03 05:48:05
Message-ID: 200201030548.g035m5R13412@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Barry Lind wrote:
> Rene,
>
> Dave and I exchanged a few emails on this a while back, and I think what
> we decided on was that we would support both make and ant independently
> in 7.3. That means two independant methods of building the code,
> makefiles that don't depend on ant, and ant that doesn't depend on make
> calling it. Both build mechanisms have their pros and cons as was born
> out in the long email thread on this topic a few weeks ago. I agreed to
> work on/support the make build method and Dave agreed to support the ant
> one.

TODO updated:

JDBC
o Support both 'make' and 'ant'

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2002-01-03 12:30:22 Re: Unable complie jdbc
Previous Message Robert Finneran 2002-01-03 04:53:23 Are there any limitations when using .jar build with 7.1.2 on a 7.1.3 database server?