Re: problems with new vacuum (??)

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>
Cc: Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: problems with new vacuum (??)
Date: 2002-01-02 18:13:32
Message-ID: 200201021813.g02IDW609895@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> In my experience enabling this feature can make a huge improvement in I/O
> intensive applications. Other options can help also, but I find dma to have
> the largest impact. I find linux almost unusable without it.

Oh, I should mention my BSD/OS data point is with one SCSI disk, soft
updates and tagged queuing enabled.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Holger Krug 2002-01-02 18:18:06 Re: Feature proposal: generalizing deferred trigger events
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-01-02 18:12:03 Re: problems with new vacuum (??)