Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: SunOS patch for memcmp()

From: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
Cc: peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net, pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SunOS patch for memcmp()
Date: 2001-12-20 04:25:17
Message-ID: 20011220132517E.t-ishii@sra.co.jp (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
> Looks like you might also want to use horology-no-DST-before-1970.out.

Done.

> > Should we use our own strtol()?
> 
> Mumble.  The memcmp fix was all from well-tested parts, but I don't
> think we have a canned test for strtol breakage available.  Also,
> I believe that the SunOS strtol lossage has been known and tolerated
> in previous Postgres releases.  Since it's not a regression, I'm going
> to change sides and vote with Peter: let's not fix this one now.

Ok.
--
Tatsuo Ishii

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-12-20 05:02:53
Subject: Re: SunOS patch for memcmp()
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-12-20 04:18:48
Subject: Re: datetime and timespan deprecated

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-12-20 05:02:53
Subject: Re: SunOS patch for memcmp()
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-12-20 03:29:18
Subject: Re: SunOS patch for memcmp()

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group