| From: | Jason Tishler <jason(at)tishler(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | "'Hannu Krosing'" <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>, "'Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD'" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-cygwin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Platform Testing - Cygwin |
| Date: | 2001-12-17 15:42:01 |
| Message-ID: | 20011217154200.GB1640@dothill.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-cygwin pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 07:47:40PM -0000, Dave Page wrote:
> I believe one of the guys at Greatbridge wroteup some benchmark results
> comparing Cygwin/*nix. I don't know where they can be found though but I've
> got a hunch Jason might have them(?).
All that I can offer is the following:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-cygwin/2001-08/msg00029.php
and specifically:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 05:50:10PM +0000, Terry Carlin wrote:
> BTW, Up through 40 users, PostgreSQL under CYGWIN using the TPC-C
> benchmark performed very much the same as Linux PostgreSQL on the
> exact hardware.
Jason
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Anil Jangam | 2001-12-18 06:13:22 | Setting unique constraints. |
| Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2001-12-17 03:19:20 | Re: [HACKERS] unexpected SIGALRM |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-12-17 15:53:39 | Re: 7.2 is slow? |
| Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2001-12-17 15:37:16 | Re: 7.2 is slow? |