Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: system catalog relation of a table and a serial sequence

From: Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: system catalog relation of a table and a serial sequence
Date: 2001-12-16 02:10:05
Message-ID: 20011216021005.GA6948@rcfile.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
[2001-12-15 21:02] Tom Lane said:
| Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org> writes:
| > I'm aware that this is not the /best/ solution to this problem, but
| > it is better than the current breakage in pg_dump.
| 
| I'd dispute that, primarily because the patch blithely assumes that
| there is no other kind of default value than a serial-created nextval().
| It looks to me like it will either coredump or do the wrong thing
| with other default-value strings.

monkey me!  Yes, quite a nasty oversight!  I'll clean this up.

thanks.
  brent

-- 
"Develop your talent, man, and leave the world something. Records are 
really gifts from people. To think that an artist would love you enough
to share his music with anyone is a beautiful thing."  -- Duane Allman

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-12-16 02:12:19
Subject: Re: system catalog relation of a table and a serial sequence
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-12-16 02:02:27
Subject: Re: system catalog relation of a table and a serial sequence

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-12-16 02:12:19
Subject: Re: system catalog relation of a table and a serial sequence
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-12-16 02:02:27
Subject: Re: system catalog relation of a table and a serial sequence

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group