| From: | Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us |
| Cc: | peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net, barry(at)xythos(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: OCTET_LENGTH is wrong |
| Date: | 2001-11-24 00:33:17 |
| Message-ID: | 20011124093317W.t-ishii@sra.co.jp |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > Yes. Consider you have UNICODE database and want to sort by French or
> > whatever LATIN locale.
> > SELECT * FROM t1 ORDER BY convert(text_column,'LATIN1');
> > would be the only way to accomplish that.
>
> That in itself would not get the job done; how is the sort operator
> to know what collation order you want?
I assume the locale support enabled of course.
> The SQL92 spec suggests that the syntax should be
>
> ... ORDER BY text_column COLLATE French;
>
> (note collation names are not standardized AFAICT). Seems to me it
> should then be the system's responsibility to make this happen,
> including any encoding conversion that might be needed before the
> comparisons could be done.
I'm not talking about our (hopefully) upcoming implementation of SQL92
COLLATE syntax. It's ideal and should be our goal, but what I have
shown is how we could do the job in 7.2 now.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Lamar Owen | 2001-11-24 00:33:44 | Re: RPMs and regression tests (was Re: v7.2b3 packaged...) |
| Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2001-11-24 00:32:22 | Re: OCTET_LENGTH is wrong |