Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Use of 'now'

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org
Cc: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Use of 'now'
Date: 2001-11-14 16:10:14
Message-ID: 200111141610.fAEGAEu13530@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-hackers
> Regarding the TIME data type: there was never a reserved value defined
> for that type, so the feature was never available for it. Since
> 'current' and 'now' are synonymous, it is a one-liner to add recognition
> of 'current' to that type. I've got patches...

You know I am totally lost with the date/time stuff.  I am just pointing
out stuff and guessing.  Please do whatever you think is appropriate.

Thanks.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Robert B. EasterDate: 2001-11-14 22:10:59
Subject: techdocs "Essential Databasing Terminology" link
Previous:From: Thomas LockhartDate: 2001-11-14 14:11:05
Subject: Re: Use of 'now'

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2001-11-14 16:24:50
Subject: Re: Open items
Previous:From: Thomas LockhartDate: 2001-11-14 14:11:05
Subject: Re: Use of 'now'

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group