Re: stupid patch of pg_dumplo

From: Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, andrea gelmini <bungle(at)linux(dot)it>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: stupid patch of pg_dumplo
Date: 2001-11-13 08:18:33
Message-ID: 20011113091833.A8441@zf.jcu.cz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 02:19:27PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Tough call. It is /contrib, which can get changes pretty late. Let's
> > > see if someone else has an opinion.
> >
> > I think pg_dumplo is mostly obsolete, no?
>
> I think it is there for older releases?

Yes, it's independent on PostgreSQL versions and pg_dump stuff.
Maybe someone like pg_dumplo output format :-)

Karel

--
Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
http://home.zf.jcu.cz/~zakkr/

C, PostgreSQL, PHP, WWW, http://docs.linux.cz, http://mape.jcu.cz

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephan Szabo 2001-11-13 08:25:11 Re: [PATCHES] More FK patches
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-11-13 04:07:04 Re: More FK patches