Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Possible patch to remove "triggered data change" support

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Possible patch to remove "triggered data change" support
Date: 2001-11-13 01:30:39
Message-ID: 200111130130.fAD1UdZ21193@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Are you saying we never need to save deferred trigger events any longer,
> > or just in this case?
> 
> The only reason we save 'em beyond the time they are executed is to support
> "triggered data change" detection.

I assume we still need a queue for deferred triggers, right?  We just
now don't need to keep them after that like we used to, right?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-11-13 01:32:51
Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE RENAME fix
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-11-13 01:28:54
Subject: Re: Possible patch to remove "triggered data change" support

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group