Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: ecpg - GRANT bug

From: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Lee Kindness <lkindness(at)csl(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, maves(at)csl(dot)co(dot)uk, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ecpg - GRANT bug
Date: 2001-10-30 06:48:15
Message-ID: 20011030074815.B1341@feivel.credativ.de (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugspgsql-hackers
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 12:44:09PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I saw that change from 8 to 7.  I think in the ecpg code that the first
> parameter to cat_str is the number of arguments _after_ the first
> parameter.

It is indeed. 

> so I think the change from 8 -> 7 is correct.

Not exactly. Yes, the cat_str has 7 arguments besides the number, but the
rule suggests it should have 8.

Michael
-- 
Michael Meskes
Michael(at)Fam-Meskes(dot)De
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire!
Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-10-30 06:50:09
Subject: Re: ecpg - GRANT bug
Previous:From: Tatsuo IshiiDate: 2001-10-30 06:20:05
Subject: Re: statistics collector

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-10-30 06:50:09
Subject: Re: ecpg - GRANT bug
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-10-30 05:29:32
Subject: Re: Bug #501: plpgsql, date data type and time change

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group