Re: Progress, anything in common with PostgreSQl besides clever

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ian Harding <ianh(at)tpchd(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Progress, anything in common with PostgreSQl besides clever
Date: 2001-10-24 17:57:39
Message-ID: 200110241757.f9OHvd813161@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> I have just talked to a salesman who is pitching a Progress
> based accounting package. I did a quick look at the marketing
> propaganda on their website, and a search of postgresql.org and
> can't find where they talk about each other. I see in Bruce's
> book mention of Ingres, but not Progress.
>
> Is their clever name (or unfortunate name, if you are searching
> the web for information) just a coincidence, or is there a
> connection?

Coincidence.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-10-24 17:59:01 Re: index files still growing
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-10-24 17:49:21 Re: [GENERAL] Using an SMP machine to make multiple indices on the same