Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration

From: "Thomas O'Dowd" <tom(at)nooper(dot)com>
To: Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>
Cc: Marko Kreen <marko(at)l-t(dot)ee>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration
Date: 2001-10-19 02:41:00
Message-ID: 20011019114100.V7183@beast.uwillsee.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc pgsql-patches

> > * In Ant the build file will be much less complex
> > than a Makefile with same functionality. And same
> > time in Ant it is much easier to check local
> > Java internal setup.
>
> I agree that this is true, but I think a much better job can be done to
> minimize the added complexity. I have looked at the old makefile and it
> was quite complex. But I have ideas on how to reduce that complexity.
>
> Basically I want to trade off a little more complexity on the part of
> the developers of jdbc, for less complexity for users to install and build.

I don't mind either way really, but I don't see why the makefile should
need to be so complex. One option is also since Postgresql uses configure
to build, we can use configure to help us detect whatever we need to
if --with-java is turned on and set suitable options/paths etc in the makefile.
That said I haven't really looked at the current build process for the driver.

Tom.
--
Thomas O'Dowd. - Nooping - http://nooper.com
tom(at)nooper(dot)com - Testing - http://nooper.co.jp/labs

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kovács Péter 2001-10-19 08:15:10 Re: JDBC 2 ResultSet and cursors
Previous Message Barry Lind 2001-10-19 01:23:19 Re: JDBC PostgreSQhelL

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gerhard Häring 2001-10-19 04:56:54 Re: Patch to fix memory leak in fetch in Python interface.
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-10-19 01:14:48 Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration