--- Martn Marqus <martin(at)bugs(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar> wrote:
> On Lun 01 Oct 2001 17:39, you wrote:
> > --- Mike Rogers <temp6453(at)hotmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > It is not the CVS version of Postgres ((*shudders* The
> actual
> > > release
> > > version is buggy enough)).  The CVS version of PHP
> > >
> > > http://www.php.net/cvsup.php
> >
> > My mistake, that last message made it seem like PG had their
> own
> > branch of PHP.  Regardless, has anyone compiled the pgsql
> > extension?  I do not want to build PG support directly into
> PHP.
> 
> In all my compilations, I used the extensions. What do yoy
> mean by "build PG 
> support directly into PHP"?

I use the php-4.0.4pl1 and php-pgsql RPMs from RedHat.  I just
want to re-build the php-pgsql extension
(/usr/lib/php4/pgsql.so) for php-4.0.4pl1 rather than with
php-4.0.6.  I do not want to re-compile PHP --with-pgsql. 

Brent

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Listen to your Yahoo! Mail messages from any phone.
http://phone.yahoo.com

In response to

• Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] PostgreSQL / PHP Overrun Error at 2001-10-01 20:49:34 from Martín Marqués

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2001-10-01 21:10:36
	Subject: Re: cvs problem
Previous:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2001-10-01 21:07:52
	Subject: Re: cvs tip problems

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2001-10-01 22:17:32
	Subject: Re: initdb must have write access to /tmp
Previous:	From: Martín Marqués	Date: 2001-10-01 20:49:34
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] PostgreSQL / PHP Overrun Error

pgsql-php by date

Next:	From: Martín Marqués	Date: 2001-10-01 21:38:17
	Subject: persistent vs. non-persistent
Previous:	From: Martín Marqués	Date: 2001-10-01 20:49:34
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] PostgreSQL / PHP Overrun Error