Re: Spinlock performance improvement proposal

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Spinlock performance improvement proposal
Date: 2001-09-28 04:13:48
Message-ID: 200109280413.f8S4DmV12052@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> Sounds cool to me ... definitely something to fix before v7.2, if its as
> "easy" as you make it sound ... I'm expecting the new drive to be
> installed today (if all goes well ... Thomas still has his date/time stuff
> to finish off, now that CVSup is fixed ...
>
> Let''s try and target Monday for Beta then? I think the only two
> outstaandings are you and Thomas right now?
>
> Bruce, that latest rtree patch looks intriguing also ... can anyone
> comment positive/negative about it, so that we can try and get that in
> before Beta?

I put it in the queue and will apply in a day or two.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2001-09-28 06:27:22 Re: multibyte performance
Previous Message Gunnar Rønning 2001-09-28 03:03:00 Re: Spinlock performance improvement proposal