> Okay, here is some bad news: I just looked into the SQL99 standard for
> the names of predefined character set names, and here is the list:
> GRAPHIC_IRV or ASCII_GRAPHIC
> LATIN1 <==== !!!
> ISO8BIT or ASCII_FULL
> So perhaps we should keep the LATIN1 thing after all? I don't like it,
> but the rules...
No way. We always need to follow the standard.
BTW, do you have the SQL99 docs online somewhere? I have a draft, but
it seemss some part of it, especially NCHAR stuffs might be change in
the very last stage...
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Tatsuo Ishii||Date: 2001-08-23 00:55:06|
|Subject: Re: encoding names|
|Previous:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2001-08-22 19:38:03|
|Subject: Re: encoding names v2.|