Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Patch list delay

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch list delay
Date: 2001-08-22 23:04:06
Message-ID: 200108222304.f7MN46J07605@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I am getting presistant requests from people asking why their patches
> > haven't appeared on the patches list yet.  I have had it happen to me. 
> 
> I believe part of the problem is that pgsql-patches has the same size
> limit (40K IIRC) as all the other lists for messages to go through
> without approval.
> 
> ISTM that for pgsql-patches a larger limit would be appropriate, at
> least a couple hundred K.

Yes.  If I am on patches, I expect to receive big files.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-08-22 23:05:07
Subject: Re: Re: JDBC changes for 7.2... some questions...
Previous:From: Peter WileyDate: 2001-08-22 22:33:28
Subject: Re: Re: JDBC changes for 7.2... some questions...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group