> On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 11:02:49AM +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> > > > I'm not sure if we are going to raise the FE/BE protocol number for
> > > > 7.2.
> > >
> > > We are not, as far as I know. I have made my changes without doing
> > > that.
> > Ok. I think we should keep getdatabaseencoding() behaves as 7.1, and
> > add a new function which returns official encoding names.
> Ok, Is here some suggestion for name of this function?
The new function returns "canonical database encoding names". So
"get_canonical_database_encoding" or shorter name looks appropriate
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tomasz Zielonka||Date: 2001-08-22 08:44:12|
|Subject: Extending triggers capabilities (inserted/deleted pseudo tables)|
|Previous:||From: jozzano||Date: 2001-08-22 07:45:14|
|Subject: PATCH proposed with new features for CREATE TABLE|
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Barry Lind||Date: 2001-08-22 10:28:00|
|Subject: patch for JDBC1 build problems|
|Previous:||From: Dave Cramer||Date: 2001-08-22 01:39:09|
|Subject: RE: Re: [PATCHES] Array Support Fix|