Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: encoding names

From: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz
Cc: pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net, barry(at)xythos(dot)com, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: encoding names
Date: 2001-08-22 08:09:50
Message-ID: 20010822170950F.t-ishii@sra.co.jp (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 11:02:49AM +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> > > > I'm not sure if we are going to raise the FE/BE protocol number for
> > > > 7.2.
> > > 
> > > We are not, as far as I know.  I have made my changes without doing
> > > that.
> > 
> > Ok. I think we should keep getdatabaseencoding() behaves as 7.1, and
> > add a new function which returns official encoding names.
> 
>  Ok, Is here some suggestion for name of this function?

The new function returns "canonical database encoding names". So 

"get_canonical_database_encoding" or shorter name looks appropriate
to me.
--
Tatsuo Ishii

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tomasz ZielonkaDate: 2001-08-22 08:44:12
Subject: Extending triggers capabilities (inserted/deleted pseudo tables)
Previous:From: jozzanoDate: 2001-08-22 07:45:14
Subject: PATCH proposed with new features for CREATE TABLE

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Barry LindDate: 2001-08-22 10:28:00
Subject: patch for JDBC1 build problems
Previous:From: Dave CramerDate: 2001-08-22 01:39:09
Subject: RE: Re: [PATCHES] Array Support Fix

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group