Re: [Fwd: Re: New EXPLAIN ANALYZE statement]

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Patches Mailing List <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: New EXPLAIN ANALYZE statement]
Date: 2001-08-21 15:01:51
Message-ID: 20010822010151.B7271@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 10:15:30AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> > I think we should include Martijn van Oosterhout's patch for his new
> > EXPLAIN ANALYZE statement in our /contrib section, as it's really
> > useful.
>
> Putting a server patch in contrib seems sorta bizarre to me. We should
> either accept the patch or not. AFAIR Martijn hasn't formally submitted
> the patch yet, so this discussion is premature anyway.

Very well. I'll tidy it up a bit and make sure it takes into account the
last set of comments and submit it tomorrow.
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
http://svana.org/kleptog/
> It would be nice if someone came up with a certification system that
> actually separated those who can barely regurgitate what they crammed over
> the last few weeks from those who command secret ninja networking powers.

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-08-21 15:46:07 Re: build fixes
Previous Message Liam Stewart 2001-08-21 14:58:46 Re: build fixes