On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 10:47:41AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> OK, I fixed the first one with:
> snprintf(PQerrormsg, PQERRORMSG_LENGTH,
> "ident_unix: unknown local user with uid %d\n", peercred.uid);
Whoops..you can tell I was just trying to get a clean build..
> In the following patch, is it correct to make ECPGd_cardinality = 1 or
> should it be put at the end of the list?
Well, I just maintained the alphabetical ordering there. Unless there's
code that depends on the specific integer values of the enumerations, it
shouldn't make a difference. Next time I'll just submit a bug to hackers
instead of delving into code I don't know all that well.
Liam Stewart :: Red Hat Canada, Ltd. :: liams(at)redhat(dot)com
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Martijn van Oosterhout||Date: 2001-08-21 15:01:51|
|Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: New EXPLAIN ANALYZE statement]|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2001-08-21 14:47:41|
|Subject: Re: build fixes|