Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords
Date: 2001-08-16 16:37:32
Message-ID: 200108161637.f7GGbWc02851@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Can someone look at our use of port->salt in the code. The call to
crypt() assumes port->salt is null-terminated, doesn't it.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-08-16 16:49:30 Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-08-16 16:23:39 Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords