Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords
Date: 2001-08-16 16:37:32
Message-ID: 200108161637.f7GGbWc02851@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Can someone look at our use of port->salt in the code.  The call to
crypt() assumes port->salt is null-terminated, doesn't it.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-08-16 16:49:30
Subject: Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-08-16 16:23:39
Subject: Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group