Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords
Date: 2001-08-15 20:46:45
Message-ID: 200108152046.f7FKkju25824@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> 
> > > Bruce Momjian writes:
> > >
> > > > Attached please find:
> > > >
> > > > 	the original proposal to encrypt pg_shadow
> > > > 	a diff of the current CVS
> > > > 	two new files (backend/libpq/md5.c and include/libpq/md5.h)
> > > > 		which implement MD5 encryption (from Vince with cleanups)
> > >
> > > I also see that the md5.c implementation does not use palloc and makes the
> > > rather odd assumption that long int == unsigned64.
> >
> > That is from Vince's code, I think.  Can you suggest a fix?
> 
> Remove that code and use contrib/pgcrypto/md5.{c.h}.  And move the .h file
> to the include tree.

So you like the pgcrypto stuff better.  That's fine.  I can't figure out
how to get that code to work in the existing md5.c.  The good thing is
that it is all in md5.c.  Can someone help?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Fernando NasserDate: 2001-08-15 20:53:50
Subject: Re: Fix for fetchone() and fetchmany() in Python interface
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2001-08-15 20:43:39
Subject: Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group