Re: indexes and big tables

From: Robert Vojta <vojta(at)ipex(dot)cz>
To: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: indexes and big tables
Date: 2001-07-27 12:30:53
Message-ID: 20010727143053.D6382@ipex.cz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I would guess the problem is the restriction on counterstamp, because
> written like that, it probably can't use the index.
>
> try something where you avoid the use of the date_part function e.g.:
> AND counterstamp > '2001-07-26 00:00:00.0'

I will try it, but it use the index when there is a few amount of rows.
When I insert a lot of rows like me (in milions), index isn't used. I don't
know the number of rows which makes border between using and don't using
index and I can discover it if you want. Going to try your suggestions ...

Best regards,
Robert

--
_
|-| __ Robert Vojta <vojta-at-ipex.cz> -= Oo.oO =-
|=| [Ll] IPEX, s.r.o.
"^" ====`o

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Colin 't Hart 2001-07-27 12:33:33 Re: Re: Re: Storing XML in PostgreSQL
Previous Message mlw 2001-07-27 11:40:38 From TODO, XML?