Re: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Re: Setuid functions

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Mark Volpe <volpe(dot)mark(at)epa(dot)gov>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Re: Setuid functions
Date: 2001-07-11 19:58:55
Message-ID: 200107111958.f6BJwtj04779@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > > I updated the patch to use the SET AUTHORIZATION { INVOKER | DEFINER }
> > > terminology. Also, the function owner is now determined and saved at compile
> > > time (no gotchas here, right?). It is located at
> > >
> > > http://volpe.home.mindspring.com/pgsql/set_auth.patch
> >
> > OK, patch applied. Can I have some docs with that burger? :-)
>
> I think we concluded that this feature introduced a security hole.

I thought that was addressed in the patch with the mention of:

> > > Also, the function owner is now determined and saved at compile
> > > time (no gotchas here, right?).

Does anyone remember?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-07-11 20:10:09 Re: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Re: Setuid functions
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-07-11 19:54:02 Re: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Re: Setuid functions

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-07-11 20:10:09 Re: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Re: Setuid functions
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-07-11 19:54:02 Re: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Re: Setuid functions