| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Martín Marqués <martin(at)bugs(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: UNDO and partially commited transactions |
| Date: | 2001-07-04 00:58:42 |
| Message-ID: | 200107040058.f640wgC02729@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I was reading the WAL documentation, and found out that UNDO is going to let
> PostgreSQL allow to make partial rollbacks on invalid transactions.
We already "undo" aborted transactions, but without using the WAL log.
Not sure if we will ever add that feature to WAL.
> What does this exactly mean? Does it mean that if I have 6 Inserts in between
> a begin work - commit work some will get through and the ones with errors no?
No, they all fail. No worries.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-07-04 01:04:24 | Re: stuck spin lock with many concurrent users |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-07-03 23:38:36 | Re: stuck spin lock with many concurrent users |