Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [Fwd: Re: Todo/missing? (was Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH])]

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: Todo/missing? (was Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH])]
Date: 2001-06-27 18:07:19
Message-ID: 200106271807.f5RI7Kx09313@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc
Done.  See TODO web page for [java] link.

> Bruce,
> 
> Can this email get added as detail for this todo item.
> 
> thanks,
> --Barry
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: Todo/missing? (was Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH])
> Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 10:33:44 -0700
> From: Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>
> To: Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net
> CC: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> References: <008301c0ff2d$c885d880$0201a8c0(at)INSPIRON>
> 
> Dave,
> 
> I personaly don't think it is worth the time to make this work correctly
> against a 7.0 database.  I think we should focus on fixing this for 7.1
> first.  Then later see if it still makes sense to work on getting 7.0
> support done.
> 
> thanks,
> --Barry
> 
> Dave Cramer wrote:
> 
>  > Barry,
>  >
>  > The getXXXFunctions aren't implemented
>  > Some of the other functions are correct for version 7.1 but not for
>  > previous versions. Ie. The row length, etc. I think the driver should
>  > get the version and determine what is correct for each version.
>  >
>  > I think this is incorrect.
>  >   public boolean supportsSelectForUpdate() throws SQLException
>  >   {
>  >     // XXX-Not Implemented
>  >     return false;
>  >   }
>  >
>  > There are a number of things here which are hard coded, and possible
>  > wrong.
>  >
>  > I started to work on this, but since I am going on vacation next week I
>  > have a number of fires to get down to a slow burn before I go.
>  >
>  > Dave
>  >
>  > -----Original Message-----
>  > From: Barry Lind [mailto:barry(at)xythos(dot)com]
>  > Sent: June 26, 2001 9:22 PM
>  > To: Dave Cramer
>  > Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
>  > Subject: Re: Todo/missing? (was Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH])
>  >
>  > Dave,
>  >
>  > Can you give a little more detail on what you mean by 'Improved
>  > DatabaseMetaData'?  What specific areas are currently lacking?
>  >
>  > thanks,
>  > --Barry
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >>>On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 10:56:18PM -0400, Dave Cramer wrote:
>  >>>
>  >>>
>  >>>>I have to agree, we need to compile a todo list.
>  >>>>
>  >>>>Mine would include:
>  >>>>
>  >>>>1) Comprehensive test suite. This may be available already.
>  >>>>2) Updateable resultSet
>  >>>>3) Improved DatabaseMetaData
>  >>>>4) Compatible blob support
>  >>>>
>  >>>>
>  >>Added to official PostgreSQL TODO:
>  >>
>  >>* JDBC
>  >>        * Comprehensive test suite. This may be available already.
>  >>        * Updateable resultSet
>  >>        * Improved DatabaseMetaData
>  >>        * Compatible blob support
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >
>  >
>  >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> 
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
> 

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Dave CramerDate: 2001-06-27 18:09:30
Subject: RE: Todo/missing? (was Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH])
Previous:From: Barry LindDate: 2001-06-27 17:51:30
Subject: Re: Todo/missing? (was Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH])

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group