Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Patch to include PAM support...

From: Mathijs Brands <mathijs(at)ilse(dot)nl>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Dominic J(dot) Eidson" <sauron(at)the-infinite(dot)org>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch to include PAM support...
Date: 2001-06-12 17:09:57
Message-ID: 20010612190957.B8203@ilse.nl (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 11:56:12AM -0400, Bruce Momjian allegedly wrote:
> Is there any interest in PAM support?  If not, I will reject this patch.

Yeah, I would be interested. It would enable me to pull passwords from
LDAP, which should enable our helpdesk to support PostgreSQL better
(change requests for passwords now go via sysadmin, while all other
passwords (ftp, staging, accounts) are stored in a central repository).

However, to me it's more of a handy featured than a critical one.

Regards,

Mathijs
-- 
"Books constitute capital." 
     Thomas Jefferson 

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2001-06-12 17:12:58
Subject: Re: Patch to include PAM support...
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-06-12 16:55:04
Subject: Re: Patch to include PAM support...

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2001-06-12 17:12:58
Subject: Re: Patch to include PAM support...
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-06-12 16:55:04
Subject: Re: Patch to include PAM support...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group