Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Patch to include PAM support...

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Dominic J(dot) Eidson" <sauron(at)the-infinite(dot)org>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch to include PAM support...
Date: 2001-06-12 16:35:10
Message-ID: 200106121635.f5CGZAM18470@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Is there any interest in PAM support?  If not, I will reject this patch.
> 
> We have seen multiple requests for PAM support, so there's interest out
> there.  But IIRC, I had some serious concerns about this proposed
> implementation.

I know there was concerns about blocking but is that problem any more so
than other interfaces we already support?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-06-12 16:39:09
Subject: Re: Australian timezone configure option
Previous:From: Vince RobertsDate: 2001-06-12 16:33:51
Subject: lo_copy routine

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-06-12 16:39:09
Subject: Re: Australian timezone configure option
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-06-12 16:32:12
Subject: Re: Patch to include PAM support...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group