On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 08:01:02PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Thoughts? Is there anything about this that might be unsafe? Should
> QueryCancel be set after *any* failure of recv() or send(), or only
> if certain errno codes are detected (and if so, which ones)?
Stevens identifies some errno codes that are not significant;
in particular, EINTR, EAGAIN, and EWOULDBLOCK. Of these, maybe
only the first occurs on a blocking socket.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2001-06-06 19:43:53|
|Subject: And what about that Debugfile?|
|Previous:||From: The Hermit Hacker||Date: 2001-06-06 19:08:15|
|Subject: Re: Dual-CPU slower then Single under HP? |