> Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Have you removed the existing stats-gathering support
> >> (backend/access/heap/stats.c and so on)?   That would buy back
> >> at least a few of the cycles involved ...
> 
> >     Not sure if we really should.  Let's  later  decide  if  it's
> >     really obsolete.
> 
> Considering that Bruce long ago ifdef'd out all the code that could
> actually *do* anything with those stats (like print them), I'd say
> it's obsolete.  In any case, it's too confusing to have two sets of
> stats-gathering code in there.  I vote for getting rid of the old
> stuff.

I agree.  Rip away.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

• Re: Access statistics at 2001-06-01 14:42:30 from Tom Lane

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Oleg Bartunov	Date: 2001-06-01 16:46:57
	Subject: Re: Re: New version of contrib-intarray
Previous:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2001-06-01 16:20:36
	Subject: Re: Access statistics