> Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Have you removed the existing stats-gathering support
> >> (backend/access/heap/stats.c and so on)? That would buy back
> >> at least a few of the cycles involved ...
> > Not sure if we really should. Let's later decide if it's
> > really obsolete.
> Considering that Bruce long ago ifdef'd out all the code that could
> actually *do* anything with those stats (like print them), I'd say
> it's obsolete. In any case, it's too confusing to have two sets of
> stats-gathering code in there. I vote for getting rid of the old
I agree. Rip away.
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Oleg Bartunov||Date: 2001-06-01 16:46:57|
|Subject: Re: Re: New version of contrib-intarray |
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2001-06-01 16:20:36|
|Subject: Re: Access statistics|