Re: Access statistics

From: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL HACKERS <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Access statistics
Date: 2001-05-31 19:10:44
Message-ID: 200105311910.f4VJAif31167@jupiter.us.greatbridge.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> > In the next couple of hours (at least tomorrow) I would be
> > ready to commit the backend changes for table-/index-access
> > statistics and current backend activity views.
> > Should I apply the patches or provide a separate patch for
> > review first?
>
> Considering that you've not offered any detailed information about
> what you plan to do (AFAIR), a patch for review first would be polite ...

We had that discussion a couple of weeks ago down to if it's
better to use UNIX or INET domain UDP sockets. But I expected
it not to be detailed enough for our current quality level
:-)

It's incomplete anyway since the per database configuration
in pg_database is missing and some other details I need to
tidy up. So I'll wrap up a patch tomorrow.

Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Karel Zak 2001-05-31 20:23:26 Re: Cache for query plans
Previous Message Nathan Myers 2001-05-31 18:38:16 Re: Imperfect solutions