Re: [PORTS] NT service design choices

From: Fred Yankowski <fred(at)ontosys(dot)com>
To:
Cc: pgsql-cygwin(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PORTS] NT service design choices
Date: 2001-05-21 20:06:43
Message-ID: 20010521150643.A90032@enteract.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-cygwin pgsql-ports

On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 01:28:57PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> The last three would seem to be generally useful additions to cygrunsrv
> anyway.

I think you're right, although to date the PostgreSQL service is the
first Cygwin service to need those features.

> I'm not sure what you mean by "dependency on other services".

The Cygwin port of PostgreSQL depends on having the 'ipc-daemon'
service already running when postmaster starts. (In fact, it's needed
for initdb too, which is the #1 FAQ for pgsql-cygwin.)

--
Fred Yankowski fred(at)OntoSys(dot)com tel: +1.630.879.1312
Principal Consultant www.OntoSys.com fax: +1.630.879.1370
OntoSys, Inc 38W242 Deerpath Rd, Batavia, IL 60510, USA

In response to

Browse pgsql-cygwin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jason Tishler 2001-05-21 20:27:07 Re: [PORTS] NT service design choices
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-05-21 17:28:57 Re: [PORTS] NT service design choices

Browse pgsql-ports by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jason Tishler 2001-05-21 20:27:07 Re: [PORTS] NT service design choices
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2001-05-21 17:41:22 Re: Problems with 7.1.1 rpm with Mandrake 8